Annabelle Lever

Published by Routledge as part of the Thinking in Action series
January 13, 2012

Chapter Summary
Table of Contents with sample chapters

This book explores the Janus-faced features of privacy, and looks at their implications for the control of personal information, for sexual and reproductive freedom, and for democratic politics. It asks what, if anything, is wrong with asking women to get licenses in order to have children, given that pregnancy and childbirth can seriously damage your health. It considers whether employers should be able to monitor the friendships and financial affairs of employees, and whether we are entitled to know whenever someone rich, famous or powerful has cancer, or an adulterous affair. It considers whether we are entitled to privacy in public and, if so, what this might mean for the use of CCTV cameras, the treatment of the homeless and the provision of public facilities such as parks, libraries and lavatories.

Above all, the book seeks to understand whether and, if so, why privacy is valuable in a democratic society, and what implications privacy has for the ways we see and treat each other. The ideas about privacy we have inherited from the past are marked by beliefs about what is desirable, realistic and possible which predate democratic government and, in some cases, predate constitutional government as well. Hence, this book argues, although privacy is an important democratic value, we can only realise that value if we use democratic ideas about the freedom, equality, security and rights of individuals to guide our understanding of privacy.


Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, June 2015, Vol. 18, Issue 3, pp 665-666 - reviewed by Dorota Mokrosinska

Journal of Moral Philosophy, 2015, Vol. 12, Issue 1, pp. 121–124 - reviewed by Jorn Sonderholm

The Philosopher's Magazine, 2nd Quarter, 2014, Issue 65, pp. 119-120 - reviewed by Alan Haworth

Law, Culture and the Humanities, February 2014, Vol. 10, 1, pp. 186-188 - author's response to James B. Rule

Law, Culture and the Humanities, February 2014, Vol. 10, 1, pp. 186-188 - reviewed by James B. Rule
Author's response to James Rule's review in Law, Culture and the Humanities, February 2014, Vol. 10, 1, pp. 188-190

Lettre du Centre Européen d'Enseignement et de Recherche en Ethique (CEERE), June 2013 - reviewed by Marie-Jo Thiel